Hi Dayanara, your explanation is extremely clear and accurate, particularly in highlighting the postulates of each test. I was surprised that you mentioned homoscedasticity in the Pearson correlation, as it's often ignored but crucial to ensuring valid results. I have a question: if we have one continuous variable and one ordinal variable, do you think Spearman would always be the most appropriate choice? I've found research that still uses Pearson in those cases, and I'd like to hear your perspective on when it might be considered acceptable or not.