Using alternative editorials to prepare for the TOEFL can be both beneficial and risky. On the one hand, these materials often provide varied exercises, explanations in different formats, and practical tips that may complement official resources. This diversity can reinforce learning and adapt to different learning styles.

However, the reliability of alternative editorials is not always guaranteed. Mistakes in practice questions, outdated formats, or misinterpretations of the TOEFL structure may confuse learners and negatively affect their performance. Therefore, it is crucial to contrast their content with official materials from Educational Testing Service (ETS), which are the most accurate source.

In conclusion, alternative editorials should be used with caution and only as a supplement to ETS materials, not as a replacement. Cross-referencing both can help learners build a more complete and reliable preparation strategy.