Inductive reasoning, consists of deriving general conclusions from particular cases, is fundamental to build ideas based on specific observations. For example, if we notice that for several consecutive days it rains in the afternoons, we could think that this will occur during the whole season; however, this type of inference will only be valid if it is based on representative cases, otherwise we could fall into hasty conclusions. In this sense, arguments supported by statistics are particularly useful, since they provide numerical support for our ideas. Even so, it is essential to examine the origin of the data, the context in which they were obtained and how they are interpreted, since an incorrect use of figures, even if they appear convincing, can lead to errors of judgment. Similarly, the use of analogies represents another effective tool in the construction of arguments, since comparing similar situations facilitates the understanding of complex concepts. However, for an analogy to have argumentative force, it must be pertinent and well-founded, since an inadequate comparison can seriously weaken the message. In addition, in a context where information abounds, it is essential that when developing our arguments we resort to reliable sources, verifying their timeliness, the author's authority and the support they have in other research. This not only strengthens our position, but also allows us to have a more objective view of the subject. So, when writing an argumentative essay, it is key to construct a clear thesis, organize our ideas coherently, support them with solid evidence and conclude by reaffirming our position. Incorporating and refuting opposing viewpoints also enriches the content and demonstrates mature critical thinking.