I agree with the argument presented, as it provides a clear and precise explanation of inductive reasoning and its application in the construction of arguments. I think it is right to highlight that inductive generalizations can be strong or weak depending on the amount and representativeness of the data, which is fundamental in critical thinking.However, I would add a small reflection on the risks of falling into the fallacy of hasty generalization, which is common when using inductive reasoning without sufficient evidence. In addition, it would be useful to reinforce the idea that the use of reliable sources not only strengthens the argument, but also demonstrates academic integrity, something essential at the university level.