The reasoning that is inductive is a basic method in critical thinking because it leads to the situation of finding generalizations out of the particular cases observed. But this conclusion can be considered valid only when you take into account the number, diversity, and representation of the things you are taken as examples. Deductive reasoning is not the one that is used to provide certainty; however, it is beneficial in the recognition of patterns and industries but can fall into the category that it may be weak and fallacious when it is grounded on insufficient or biased samples. In this perspective, the force of statistical arguments lies in the use of quantitative data to back up the author's statement, which is effective as long as the data is related to the problem under consideration, up-to-date, and obtained through well-managed methods. Another example of this is analogical reasoning, a method in which two or more items are compared to the point of view of common features together with the less observable ones. Thus, the reasoning is valid. In essence, the method of proof would follow the similar lines of two similar variables and then only conclude that they must also share the same unseen characteristics. On the other hand, if the common characteristics are significant and substantive, then the method can be quite persuasive but if they are only visible characteristics, the method might be the subject of an easy critique. It is important to get and critically evaluate sources wherever you may present an argument to ensure your message is well-fashioned and convincing. Amongst these is the finding of good-quality sources. It is essential to use sources that are academically credible, unbiased, high-quality, recent, and that relate directly to the subject. In the case of argumentative writing, the initial requirement is to establish a point of view and to vigorously support it through a suitable pattern of argument, including the part where you refute counterarguments (introduction, body, conclusion), and also using extensive evidence to establish the reasoning of the writer, which also requires the need to analyze, synthesize and critically evaluate information effectively.