Personally, I would argue that if you take away inductive reasoning from critical thinking you take away a large part of this process. Through inductive reasoning, we move from particular observations to general conclusions. It is a way of hypothesis creating. But it is true, the conclusions we draw in this manner are only probable, none are certain. Also, inductive reasoning allows for arguments based on statistics and for arguments based on analogies. But not all statistics are make quantitatively strong, it depends on the sample size. And not all analogies are appropriate and make the analogy deductively. In addition, always be selects for the strongest argument. In writing essays, remember that although you introduce buy zolpidem safely the evidence at the very beginning of your essay, your evidence needs to be the sort of evidence that PRESENTS your argument. You can't do that if you don't have a clear thesis and if you don't have a discernible line of thought. Otherwise, your conclusion is going to fare much better, at least with the morbidly curious readers who weren't impressed with the quality of your argument.