I agree with your observations on the importance of using clear and specific language in arguments. Being precise, as in the case of “Ecuador's economic freedom”, builds credibility and strengthens arguments. I also like how you have explained the different types of definitions, which help to clarify complex issues. Your analysis of emotional language hits the nail on the head: it can divert attention from facts to feelings, which weakens the argument. The example of the GTA 6 argument shows how hasty generalization can oversimplify things. Overall, your post makes it easier to understand complex ideas and encourages deeper reflection on how we construct and analyze arguments.