Obviously, when analyzing or arguing, precise definitions are absolutely necessary to avoid misinterpretations and ensure that everything is logically understood. That's why there are different types of definitions, such as stipulated, lexical, and operational definitions, which help achieve a better understanding by avoiding bias and, above all, ambiguity.

To begin with, emotive language is persuasive, which can distort reasoning somewhat by emphasizing emotions rather than logic. This makes the metaphysical more important than the physical, which leads to disputes. Furthermore, what often happens is ad hominem (attacking the person rather than the argument) and suggesting extreme consequences for small actions end up distorting the correct reasoning process. Fallacies that lack sufficient evidence, such as generalization, further compromise the validity of the argument.
So, to avoid this, diagramming helps improve the structure of reasoning by identifying connections and weaknesses. Likewise, being punctual is sometimes necessary, for example, not so many examples; also, summarizing and paraphrasing longer arguments allows for a better understanding of the ideas.